Showing posts with label Madman (1982). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Madman (1982). Show all posts

Monday, April 23, 2012

10 Slashers That Could Benefit from a Remake: MADMAN (1982)

Now that we're well into 2012, something has occurred to me: it's the first year in a decade that has no slasher remakes scheduled for release. While the remakes have swooned the box office with usual great success, very few horror film movements have drawn up as much protest as the dreaded remake craze did.

It's pretty obvious, looking back, as to how studios and producers chose which slashers were deemed worth remaking - they were the slashers that were original moneymakers upon their original release. HALLOWEEN, THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, FRIDAY THE 13TH, PROM NIGHT, THE HILLS HAVE EYES, and A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET were all monster successes and pop-culture phenomenon's. Even more cult-y slashers like BLACK CHRISTMAS and MY BLOODY VALENTINE had earned a solid enough reputation to guarantee a solid fanbase.

But when you really think about it, doesn't the thought of remaking more well-known slasher films seem to sort of juxtapose what a remake stands for? Shouldn't they be remaking films that are less-known and more dated, to bring them to a modern-day audience? While 2012 might not have any remakes on its schedule, I can guarantee you that a second wave of remakes will eventually come along. But when it does, it should be focusing its efforts on the movies that actually could benefit from a redo. As we take a break from remakes in theaters, here's the ten suggestions for films to consider a redux for, and ways to take the original movie and make it fresh and modern without spitting in the face of the original's fans (here's looking at you, Rob Zombie!).


10. MADMAN



Ah... the story of a crazed murdering farmer named Madman Marz who returns from the grave when his name is said above a whisper to continue his bloody rampage. Madman may have suffered from cheesy acting and incredibly stupid characters, but it succeeded in some ways to: technically its a very well shot film for a low-budget piece, and the actual backstory of Madman Marz is quite interesting. There is a lot that can be done with a villain like Madman Marz, and his story shouldn't go to waste just because his original effort never really took off into mainstream success.

Now, it has been thirty years since Madman was released in 1982, so the idea of a sequel is pretty much out of the question. At this point, the only way Madman Marz could actually be brought back would be through a remake. It's all a question of financial stability, and Madman is going to make more of its money back through a story where you don't have to see the original.


THE CONCEPT


The core of the story needs to stay the same, but the rest of the movie should be a little different to make it less Friday the 13th-ish and more of its own beast. That means completely removing the summer camp. Yes, I said it: the summer camp has nothing to do with Madman Marz's actual backstory, so therefore it is irrelevant to the plot. Madman is the story of a crazed farmer attacking his family, meaning that the main plot sound revolve around that crazed farmer attacking different families and farmers.

Remember, most good slasher movies have something horrible from the past coming back to haunt the people of the present. It is when citizens begin to forget the horrors of what once happened that the killer resurfaces with his or her vengeance. The protagonists of the original Madman had little to do with the character himself, which was one of the film's most unnoticed flaws. They were random slasher fodder.

The kids of Elm Street are offspring of the parents that killed Freddy Krueger, thus him targeting them made sense. The kids of Crystal Lake were trying to re-open a specific camp that Mrs. Voorhees and Jason wanted to never open again. Michael Myers stalks Haddonfield babysitters to re-create his original murder. Chucky kills those he blames for his own death, or whom he could use to transform into a human body. Leatherface and his family kill people not only to eat them, but because they happened to stumble upon the family's grave-robbing secret. What is Madman's motive?

So there's something really simple here: Madman must attack a specific group of teens - either teens that moved into the Marz farm where he committed his original brutal murders, or have one of the teens be a descendent of someone who lynched him. Or... why not do both? A new family moves into town, taking up residence at the Marz estate. The family's teenage boy quickly tries to befriend a local teenage girl, who's father and grandfather led the lynching of Madman Marz. That's two people already that Madman has a strong reason for wanting dead; the others could just be their unfortunate friends. By connecting the past to the present, the story has more depth.


THE PLOT


In the vein of the FRIDAY THE 13TH remake, the film would start with a brief flashback outlining the history of Madman Marz: in 1982, he murdered his wife and kids in his farmhouse and then was lynched by an angry mob. The next day, his body disappared... keep it very brief and dark, and don't give away too much or reveal Madman - keeping him hidden in the shadows to build anticipation and strengthen his uncanny relationship with the audience.

Cut to modern day; over thirty years later, Madman has become a legend. The modern teens don't pay any mind to the legend of Madman. Including horror movie obsessed theater students Dippy and Ellie, who also can't get enough of each other (if you know what I mean). To get Ellie in the mood, Dippy tells her the story of Madman Marz, and disobeys the legend - he says "Madman Marz" above a whisper! Then, Madman is summoned, and you can guess what happens to Ellie and Dippy.

The next morning, 17-year old Richie and his 14-year old sister Shirley are being driven to their first day at a new school. Their father suffered some legal troubles, lost his job, and the family was forced to move from their comfortable city life to the country. Richie's first day finds him being bullied by the jocks and publicly humiliated. The only friends he makes are social outcast T.P. and the sheriff's daughter Betsy.

When Ellie and Dippy are reported missing, the sheriff looks at the suspects in school, but as his investigation continues, he stumbles upon evidence that Madman Marz is responsible. "Impossible," the sheriff thinks, as he was among those that lynched Madman back in '82. But as it turns out, Madman is back, and he's targeting Richie's family living in house, as well as Betsy and her friends for revenge against the sheriff.

Soon, Richie and Betsy team up as they make more gruesome discoveries, leading to a climax where Richie discovers a pretty nasty sight in his basement...

THE GORE


Madman
is an R-rated story. The beginning tells the story of an insane farmer that kills his wife and kids. Definitely not a family-friendly movie, so why not go for the hard R-rating? The original film has become infamous for its cheesy gore effects, so it only seems right to amp up the effects: the car hood decapitation must stay, but there's still plenty of victims for Madman to get creative with...

THE CHARACTERS


Richie Steele
. Male, 17. Smart, perceptive, and gentle, and recently having come into his looks. He's still a geek, and certainly dresses like one, but he's also a really cool, kind kid.

Betsy Dubin. Female, 17. Blonde, sweet, and self-conscious girl that keeps to herself yet is still somehow popular. There's an intriguing mystery surrounding her that she does not even suspect.

Sheriff Dubin. Male, 50s. Betsy's hard-boiled father who also works as the Sheriff around town. He's well respect, but hides dark secrets and regrets. The guy who would go to any kind of extreme to protect his daughter's innocence.

Mr. Steele. Male, 40s. The once successful and wealthy Wall Street broker that has been humbled by a series of misfortunes and bad luck. He lost his job, and now has to try to start a new life. His heart is in the right place, but sometimes he clashes with his children.

Mrs. Steele. Female, 40s. Down to earth and loyal matriarch of the Steele family. She desperately wants to keep her family together, but sometimes its too hard to handle. She has really high hopes for starting a new life in a new town.

Shirley Steele. Female, 14. Richie's stubborn and rebellious younger sister; the polar opposite of him: consumed by boys and appearances. Moving has been hard on her, but she's confident she can fit in anywhere.

Dave Jones. Male, 17. Definitely a jock: someone who is popular solely because of his looks and athleticism, but not his brains. He can be manipulative and cruel, especially when he feels threatened.

Billy Murphy. Male, 17. Another popular jock, he's best friends with Dave. He's in an on-again, off-again relationship with Stacy.

Stacy Bass. Female, 17. Betsy's best friend. She's a bubble-gum chewing, gossiping girl who likes to tease her sometimes-boyfriend Billy. Her sarcastic wit and huge breasts have elevated her popularity.

T.P. Fish. Male, 17. The class geek, but no the cool kind of geek. The kind of geek that totally lacks self-awareness; bumbling, idiotic, and often obnoxious. Still, he's a good kid, and the first person in school to actually befriend Richie.

Ellie Claire. Female, 17. Mousy theater nerd who just lost her virginity to her boyfriend Dippy, and the two literally can't stop getting it on.

Dippy Sullivan. Male, 17. Plain, average-joe farm boy who has a fascination with horror movies. He wants to write his own horror movie, on the legend of Madman Marz. With his girlfriend Ellie as the star.

FINAL THOUGHTS


Madman
is a cult classic that deserves to be brought to life for a new generation. The original film is dated and cheesy, and with the right filmmakers it could be resurrected and made scary. Plus, it wouldn't need to be a Friday the 13th-rip off, but could really find a way to become something unique in its own right.

Madman should not be the same movie as the 1982 movie, but should only keep the core story about Madman and then venture out into new territory. If we wanted to see the 1982 movie, we'd watch the 1982 movie. All what the fans want is more of Madman Marz. So why not give it to them?

Sunday, January 22, 2012

"What If?" Sequels: Part 2

Continuing on the countdown of the 10 slasher films that deserved a franchise but sadly never got one. The previous five films were:

10. TOURIST TRAP (1979)
9. HELL NIGHT (1981)
8. THE MUTILATOR (1985)
7. HUMONGOUS (1982)
6. NIGHT OF THE DEMON (1980)

Here are the following five slashers that I would have loved to see continue their stories...

(SPOILERS BELOW)


5. NIGHT WARNING (1983) - a.k.a Butcher Baker Nightmare Maker 

Original Film's Logline: When orphaned Billy Lynch (Jimmy McNichol) tells his over-protective, practically incestuous Aunt Cheryl (Susan Tyrrell) that he's leaving her to study at the University of Denver she begins a murderous rampage to make sure he stays with her... forever.

How the Original Ended: Billy and his girlfriend Julia (Julia Duffy) discover Aunt Cheryl's crimes and, when she attacks them, Billy ends up stabbing her to death. Homophobic detective Joe Carlson (Bo Svenson) arrives on the scene, looking to pin the killings on Billy (who he has had it out for since the beginning). He threatens Billy with a gun, but Billy is saved by his coach (Steve Eastin) and Billy ends up shooting Carlson in self defense. Billy and Julia then go to the University of Denver together.

Sequel Idea: You can always continue a good story, even if the main villain of the original has been killed off - just look at SCREAM and FRIDAY THE 13TH! In their respective sequels, a new murderer sets the pace for the sequel, so the same thing could have easily been done with Night Warning. If they were to have made a Night Warning 2, it would be a mix of SCREAM 2 and FRIDAY THE 13TH PART V: A NEW BEGINNING. Jimmy McNichol and Julia Duffy would have had to return as Billy and Julia. Once again, a series of grisly murders connected to Billy's would start anew. The police would immediately look toward Billy, after the events of the last film, and Billy would begin to assume that, quite possibly, he is taking up Aunt Cheryl's old murderous ways. Could it be Billy, who has now gone insane? Could it be a copycat killer? Or could it be a relative of Joe Carlson, out for revenge on Billy?

Sadly, a sequel to Night Warning is kind of impossible at this point - the film has become too obscure and the principal cast is way too old to continue things. It's a shame, too, because Night Warning could have had a sequel (or even a trilogy) of great, scary mysteries surrounding the life of Billy Lynch. 


4. JUST BEFORE DAWN (1981)

Original Film's Logline: When one of them inherits land in the Oregon mountains, five friends travel for a weekend of camping and hiking and, after warnings from local mountain ranger Roy McLean (George Kennedy), they fall prey to a machete-wielding mountain man.

How the Original Ended: After discovering that their three friends have been killed, Warren (Gregg Henry) and Constance (Deborah Benson) make one last stand until morning and are attacked by - not just one mountain man - but two of them! They are twins with an identical taste for terror. Ultimately, it is Constance who ends up killing them and saving her wimpy boyfriend Warren from the madmen.

Sequel Idea: It might be hard to make a sequel to Just Before Dawn, as the villains of the first movie have been killed off. But what about taking the original idea for THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE 2 and putting a spin on it for the Just Before Dawn universe? The original plot for Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 was to have a whole town of cannibals, so Just Before Dawn 2 could have a whole community of deranged, psychotic hillbillies. The events of the first film could set into motion a terrifying series of events - Constance, Warren, and Ranger McLean escape and alert authorities about what happened, and thus the whole community is questioned as accomplices and suspects. Then... the psycho hillbillies flee the mountains for the nearest "civilized" community, and the bloodshed starts again!

A bigger body count is a must, and a sequel has to retain that key atmospheric build and beautiful cinematography. But the idea of a sequel has always been to make the story larger and grander. How much larger can you get than a whole town of hillbilly psychos terrorizing a town of normal folks? And maybe add in some soci-economic commentary, making the town the hillbillies attack a development community that is being built on land that was once sacred to the hillbillies?


3. THE PROWLER (1981) - a.k.a. Rosemary's Killer 

Original Film's Logline: Hell-bent on reliving a gruesome unsolved double-homicide from 35 years ago, a masked killer in Army Fatigues stalks and brutally slashes a group of college students holding a spring dance.

How the Original Ended: Pam (Vicky Dawson) and her boyfriend/the town deputy Mark (Christopher Goutman) survive the killer, who it turns out is the Sheriff (Farley Granger), who originally killed Rosemary (Joy Glaccum) and Roy (Timothy Whrer) out of a jealous rage after returning from World War II. Ultimately, Pam and Mark kill the Sheriff by blowing his head off with a shotgun.

Sequel Idea: In the original film, there was a gap of 35 years between the murders of Rosemary and Roy in 1945 and the main murders of the film (which take place in 1980, even though the film's release was 1981). Well, the 35th anniversary of the film is coming up (the anniversary of the murders will be 2015 while the actual film's 35th anniversary will be 2016). So, how about a sequel or reboot that plays on the idea of 35 years later (70 years after the murders of Rosemary and Roy!). Just think - ever since the events of the first movie, the town has not held the spring dance... but now think its time to move on and hold the dance again - it's a whole new generation! But this time, more murders start up, and a whole new mystery begins to unfold.

It might sound almost exactly the same, but after three and a half decades you can get some unique things thrown into the plot. And rather than being a remake, it has to be a sequel - acknowledging the events of the first movie but still catering to a whole new generation of slasher fans (sort of like MY BLOODY VALENTINE and its reboot). 


2. MADMAN (1982)

Original Film's Logline: At a summer camp for special needs children, one of the cocky campers calls out the name of "Madman Marz", a deceased mass murderer. It isn't long before the camp counselors start getting butchered by the legendary Madman Marz.

How the Original Ended: When she realizes that all the other camp counselors have been killed, Betsy (Gaylen Ross from DAWN OF THE DEAD, as Alexis Dubin here) packs the kids up in a bus and tries to escape, only to realize that she is missing Richie (Jimmy Steele), the camper who originally summoned Madman Marz. She gets the bus to safety and goes to the Marz farmhouse, looking for Richie, but instead encounters Madman Marz (Paul Ehlers). He kills her, and Richie witnesses the whole thing and runs away. Madman lives to kill again.

Sequel Idea: Wow, where to begin. It's amazing that a sequel to Madman was never made. It has a classic villain, a detailed backstory, and the original film ends on a beat that is just asking for a sequel. I mean, really, after the watching the first movie can you honestly say that you don't want to see more of Madman Marz? Here's an idea - now that he has been summoned, how does one stop Madman? That issue was never addressed in the original movie, but could have been addressed in the sequel. Also, wouldn't it make sense for Madman to start hunting down the people who killed him in the first place - an act of vengeance on his executioners? It all seems logical and sensible for a sequel.

The original Madman might not be the most competent movie, but its insanely fun to watch. I feel like, had a whole series stemmed, it could have been even more exciting to watch than any of the Jason or Freddy flicks. And apparently Paul Ehlers has been trying to get a sequel/remake made for years, but nothing has really seemed to come of it. 


1. THE BURNING (1981)

Original Film's Logline: After being horribly burned in a prank gone wrong, former camp caretaker Cropsy (Lou David) is released from the hospital psychiatric ward and goes on a killing spree, targeting the teens he blames for his disfigurement.

How the Original Ended: The first movie ended in a showdown between Cropsy and the film's hero Todd (Brian Matthews) as Todd is trying to save geeky and slightly perverted camper Alfred (Brian Backer) from Cropsy's clutches. Todd ends up killing Cropsy in the end, and he and Alfred are rescued by Todd's girlfriend Michelle (Leah Ayres), who has called the in the police.

Sequel Idea: The Burning is another one that I'm just amazed has never had a sequel, especially since its production company Mirimax (Harvey Weinstein's company) took off shortly after its release. It has all the right ingredients - a cool killer, awesome atmosphere, insanely cool death scenes, and a decent amount of suspense. Cropsy would have to return, in zombie form (hey, Jason and Michael get away with it, why can't Cropsy?), and a new group of teens would have to be in danger. Probably not campers, as that has been done. But what about people on an outward bounding trip? And to throw some more conflict into the mix, how about some criminals on the run, too. The criminals take a group of outward bounding people hostages and they hide out in the ruins of Camp Blackfoot, where Cropsy returns and starts slicing and dicing. To add even more spice into the mix, Todd could return - he has made it his personal mission to make sure Cropsy never kills again, and securing Camp Blackfoot seems like the best way.

I love the original The Burning so much. I'd rank it up there with some of the all-time greats, and I think its better than any Friday the 13th film. But now thinking about The Burning, maybe part of its appeal is that stands alone. Maybe a sequel would have bastardized it? Or maybe a sequel would have been just what it needed? Sadly, we'll never know, as right now the only chance we have of resurrecting this film is with a remake.



So there you have it! The ten movies that, in my opinion, deserved sequels. I'd love to hear of how you would make a sequel to any of these flicks, or even something I left off the list.